| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Chimel v. California ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Chimel v. California
''Chimel v. California'', 395 U.S. 752 (1969), is a 1969 Supreme Court of the United States case. In ''Chimel'', the Court held that police officers arresting a person in his or her home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, although they may search the area within immediate reach of the person. The rule relating to searches incident to a lawful arrest within the home is now known as the ''Chimel'' rule.
Ronald M. George, the young deputy attorney general who unsuccessfully argued the State of California's position before the high court, would ultimately serve as Chief Justice of California.
==Prior caselaw==
Prior to ''Chimel'', the Court's precedents permitted an arresting officer to search the area within an arrestee's "possession" and "control" for the purpose of gathering evidence.〔''Riley v. California''〕 Based on this "abstract doctrine", the Court had sustained searches that extended far beyond an arrestee's grabbing area.〔''Riley v. California''〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Chimel v. California」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|